|
||
|
||
|
||
The combination of graffiti knowledge, transferred onto computers; from a world, where addition and decoration are seen as counterproductive, where less is more. The synergy results in non-classic types, something we like to call typograffiti. In the course of years, they have changed their characteristic form and evolved new categories; from the initial, drawn by hand, to those addressing the characteristics of the digital and deduction. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The combination of graffiti knowledge, transferred onto computers; from a world, where addition and decoration are seen as counterproductive, where less is more. The synergy results in non-classic types, something we like to call typograffiti. In the course of years, they have changed their characteristic form and evolved new categories; from the initial, drawn by hand, to those addressing the characteristics of the digital and deduction. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The combination of graffiti knowledge, transferred onto computers; from a world, where addition and decoration are seen as counterproductive, where less is more. The synergy results in non-classic types, something we like to call typograffiti. In the course of years, they have changed their characteristic form and evolved new categories; from the initial, drawn by hand, to those addressing the characteristics of the digital and deduction. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
In a system of typograms, a module is with regards to its interface a well-defined component, which can be interchanged without disassembly. However, with semantically relevant modules, this no longer holds true; they cannot be substituted for the simple fact that they are modules themselves. Their use can be limited to one element or can comprise the entire character. |
|
||
|
||

